More Odds and Ends
I hope you will find the topics and information on this page interesting and informative:
The Pipe Creek Circular
The Pipe Creek Circular, which was an order written by General George Meade late on the night of June 30, is usually given little thought by anyone studying the battle unless they read where it was used to criticize General Meade as being an indecisive and/or timid commanding general. That is truly a shame, for this order exemplifies, at least in my opinion, the brilliance of such a detailed and flexible plan that fully complied with his orders from Washington D.C. to locate and engage the enemy but while still covering both that city and Baltimore as well.
The Pipe Creek Circular, which thoroughly elaborated how, if the order needed to be carried out, all of the individual Union Corps would fall back to a roughly 20-mile long defensive position on the rolling hills along Big Pipe Creek from Middleburg, Maryland to Manchester, Maryland (see the map below):
(Map courtesy of Ronald A. Church)
The topography of this area also allowed the Union Army the option of switching to offensive operations, provided for good communications and a road network along the rear of the line and, in addition, to the main supply base only 8 miles away at Westminster, Maryland.
There is still some dispute as to whether or not all of the Union Corps commanders and General John Buford received the order that was actually sent out on July 1 but was later rescinded when General John Reynolds decided to stay and fight it out. It is important to remember that those who did receive the Pipe Creek Circular (like Generals Henry Slocum and Dan Sickles, for example) no doubt had it in mind when determining when and how they responded to the urgent pleas for support from General Howard and his XI Corps on the left wing that was already engaged in action.
To read the text (about 1,000 words in length) of the Pipe Creek Circular, go to the webpage at http://www.civilwarhome.com/pipecree.htm, and to read the best analysis that I have found so far on this overlooked but critical “piece” of the battle, I strongly recommend reading the excellent overview written by Ronald A. Church at http://www.civilwarhome.com/pcl.htm. Mr. Church has included two maps (one of which is pictured above) as well as a series of photographs taken in 1997 of a 10-stop tour of areas along the Pipe Creek Line at http://www.civilwarhome.com/pcltoday.htm. You owe it to yourself to learn more about the Pipe Creek Circular, and the links above are the ideal place to start !!!
The monument and marker to the 26th Pennsylvania Emergency Regiment
While most battlefield visitors have more than likely seen the monument and two ground-level markers to the 26th Pennsylvania Emergency Regiment which are located 3 blocks west of the square at the “Y” intersection of Chambersburg Street (Route 30 West) and Springs Avenue, there is another smaller marker about 3 miles further west of town roughly 100 yards east of Marsh Creek on the north side of the road. This marker indicates the general area where this newly formed regiment (it was only mustered in on June 22 with about 750 men and included about 21 students of Pennsylvania College in Company A) had set up camp and briefly encountered General John B. Gordon’s Brigade on June 26. After their pickets fired a few rounds at the oncoming Confederate troops, the 26th Pennsylvania Emergency Regiment, commanded by Colonel William W. Jennings, wisely retreated to the northwest, ultimately reaching Harrisburg on June 28:
(Photo courtesy of Mike Waricher and the GNMP)
The U.S. Regulars
While they may not have played a large role in one of the more well-known phases of the battle, the bravery and sacrifices of the two infantry brigades of U.S. Regulars in General Romeyn B. Ayres’ Second Division of General George Sykes’ Union V Corps on July 2 should not be overlooked or forgotten. The First Brigade, commanded by Colonel Hannibal Day, consisted of the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment, 4th U.S. Infantry Regiment, 6th U.S. Infantry Regiment, 12th U.S. Infantry Regiment, and 14th U.S. Infantry Regiment. The Second Brigade, commanded by Colonel Sidney Burbank, consisted of the 2nd U.S. Infantry Regiment, 7th U.S. Infantry Regiment, 10th U.S. Infantry Regiment, 11th U.S. Infantry Regiment, and 17th U.S. Infantry Regiment. Comprised of relatively small regiments (the 10th U.S. Infantry Regiment only had 3 Companies, and two other regiments only had 4 Companies), the two brigades moved from their initial position on the northern slope of Little Round Top to Houck’s Ridge on the eastern edge of and then into the Wheatfield to support General John C. Caldwell’s Division of the Union II Corps. Encountering four brigades of Confederate infantry on their front and both flanks, the two brigades of U.S. Regulars eventually began to fall back as if on drill, stopping at intervals to turn around and return fire as they slowly and methodically retreated to their initial position on the northern slope of Little Round Top. When it was all said and done, these two brigades of U.S. Regulars totaling approximately 2,600 soldiers suffered roughly 800 casualties in about an hour. One Union soldier in a nearby state volunteer regiment is reported to have once said something like “For two years, the Regulars taught us how to act like soldiers. At Gettysburg, they showed us how to die like soldiers."
Most of the individual monuments to these regiments are easily visible along Ayres Avenue on the crest of Houck’s Ridge):
However, the monument to the 17th U.S. Infantry Regiment is located in a small ravine below a stone wall and roughly 40 yards south of the monument to the 11th U.S. Infantry Regiment:
In addition, the monument to the 14th U.S. Infantry Regiment is located roughly 55 yards southeast of the crest of Houck’s Ridge and about 55 yards west of Crawford Avenue:
It should also be noted that there was one more regiment of U.S. Regulars at Gettysburg, the 8th U.S. Infantry Regiment, which served as part of the Headquarters Provost Guard for General George Meade at the Lydia Leister house on the west side of the Taneytown Road behind Cemetery Ridge:
It is fitting, though, that one of the most prominent monuments on Cemetery Ridge is the tall obelisk monument honoring all of the U.S. Regular Army infantry, artillery, cavalry and engineer units that served in the Gettysburg Campaign:
They also served
There are at least two small markers on the battlefield to honor Union troops that did not take part in any real fighting but served necessary roles nonetheless. Located along the east side of the Baltimore Pike roughly 70 yards south of the entrance to the new Visitor Center is the small marker for the 10th Maine Infantry Battalion, commanded by Captain John D. Beardsley, which served as the Provost Guard for General Henry W. Slocum’s XII Corps headquarters:
Another small marker, located just a short distance west of the Baltimore Pike at the intersection of Granite School House Lane and Blacksmith Shop Road, is for the 4th New Jersey Infantry Regiment, commanded by Major Charles Ewing and was part of the First New Jersey Brigade (see the “Faces of the battle” section on my “Something Different” page). Companies A, C, and H served as the brigade’s Provost Guard while the rest of the regiment guarded the Union Artillery Reserve train:
And two women too...
One of the most noticeable and unusual monuments on the battlefield is the “castle” monument to the 12th New York and 44th New York Infantry Regiments on Little Round Top:
In addition to the unique exterior design, an unusual aspect of the monument is in the interior on the bronze tablets listing not only individual officers and lower ranking soldiers but also commissary sergeants, hospital stewards, band members, and sutlers. But what is truly unusual is that these plaques also include the names of two women: Lora A. Hudson Bissell and Harriet Weld Corning.
Lora A. Hudson Bissell, the daughter of a Baptist clergyman, was born near Albany, New York in 1839. She became a schoolteacher and wrote the words to the poem “Ellsworth Avengers” to honor Colonel Elmer Ellsworth of the 11th New York Infantry Regiment, the first Union officer killed in the Civil War in May of 1861. Members of the 44th New York Infantry Regiment learned of the song, called upon Miss Hudson and asked permission to adopt the words as its regimental song. Learning of her desire to serve her country, they invited her to accompany them as the "Daughter of the Regiment." Miss Hudson did so, and joined the regiment as a volunteer nurse, later marrying Dr. Elias Bissell, Assistant Surgeon of the 44th New York Infantry Regiment, in 1864.
(Image courtesy of Forest Lawn
Cemetery in Buffalo, New York)
Harriet Weld Corning was a member of the wealthy and eminent Weld family of Roxbury, Massachusetts. Born in 1793, she later married Erastus Corning, an enterprising businessman from Norwich, Connecticut who made his mark in hardware, nail and iron works, and other business ventures in and near Albany, New York. He also became involved in politics on the state level as well as serving as a U.S. Congressman in the late 1850’s and early 1860’s. As one of the plaques inside the monument states:
“And as a
Tribute to a
Mrs. Harriet Weld Corning,
who presented the 44th regiment the colors
under which it fought, with the injunction to
"preserve it forever from the traitor's
touch and let no coward's hand trail it in the dust."
(Image courtesy of the Albany
Institute of History & Art)
And now you know about the only regimental monument on the Gettysburg battlefield which honors two women.
Original Massachusetts infantry regiment markers
Although the original metal markers for many of the Massachusetts infantry regiments (the ones which can be found on the south side of the “copse of trees” on Cemetery Ridge to the 15th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, the 19th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, and the 20th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment are not original. To make a long story short, the stone monuments to these three regiments marking where they helped to repulse “Pickett’s Charge” were later moved to their original “line of battle” positions. Afterward, veterans of those units in the early 1900’s asked for and were given permission to have iron posts installed with signs denoting their “advanced positions”, but the signposts were later removed by the National Park Service in the 1950’s as being superfluous. The Civil War Round Table of Eastern Pennsylvania funded the replacement of the three signposts in 1993, and are the ones we see today --- for more information, read “Isn’t This Glorious!”: The 15th, 19th, and 20th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry Regiments at Gettysburg’s Copse of Trees” by Edwin R. Root and Jeffrey D. Stocker) have long disappeared, some of the uniquely shaped bases can still be found elsewhere on the battlefield. One of these (most likely to the 33rd Massachusetts Infantry Regiment) is located on the east side of East Cemetery Hill along the north side of the second stone wall (out of the five parallel stone walls, and counting them from south to north) about halfway down to Wainwright Avenue:
(Photo courtesy of the GNMP and Mike Waricher)
Other bases can be found on Little Round Top, Munshower’s Knoll (the location of the equestrian monument to Union VI Corps commander General John Sedgwick) just north of Little Round Top, and the Wheatfield. So, if you are in the vicinity of a monument to a Massachusetts infantry regiment, take a look around and see if you can find one of those old bases:
18th Massachusetts (Little Round Top) --- at stone wall 25 yards northwest of the 83rd Pennsylvania
22 Massachusetts (Little Round Top) --- at stone wall 55 yards northwest of the 83rd Pennsylvania
32nd Massachusetts (Wheatfield) --- at stone wall 85 yards east of the 17th Maine
33rd Massachusetts (Cemetery Hill) --- at stone wall 80 yards west of 14th Indiana right flank marker
37th Massachusetts (Munshower’s Knoll) --- north of Battery C, 1st New York Artillery
monuments that have been moved
In addition to the well-known statue located along the east side of Stone Avenue on McPherson's Ridge of “citizen soldier” John Burns (see the “Speaking of John Burns” section on my “Odds and Ends” page), there are two other original bases of monuments that were moved which are also fairly easy to find.
One of them is the original base for the monument to the 5th New York Cavalry Regiment, commanded by Major John Hammond and one of the regiments that participated in the ill-fated cavalry charge by Union General Elon Farnsworth’s Brigade (see the “The South Cavalry Battlefield --- the other cavalry action on July 3” section on my “Off the Usual Path” page). The original base is roughly 4 feet by 8 feet and located about 20 yards off of the west side of South Confederate Avenue about halfway up the hill as you climb northward along the western base of Big Round Top and the large parking area on the left. Look for the twin trees on your left and only a few feet off the road (see the left photo below):
The other one is the original base for the monument to the 16th Vermont Infantry Regiment, commanded by Colonel Wheelock G. Veazey. The monument was originally located approximately 1,000 yards west of its current position (as the bronze plaque that was attached to the new base after the monument was moved now indicates), which is on the east side of Hancock Avenue along Cemetery Ridge just north of Pleasonton Avenue. What is really interesting to me is that apparently the original base was not left where it was (as was in the case of the other bases mentioned above), but was moved approximately 1,120 yards (i.e., about 120 yards further east of the monument’s new location) directly to the east and then discarded along a small stone wall running parallel to Pleasonton Avenue. The monument may have been moved when Camp Colt was built in that area (see the “Camp Colt” section on my “Odds and Ends” page), and a larger base was necessary to accommodate the bronze plaque, but if the base shown in the bottom right photo is indeed the original base, then why was it discarded there ???
The monument to the 2nd Delaware Infantry Regiment commanded by Colonel William P. Baily was another monument that had been moved and the remnants its original base can still be found if you look carefully. The monument was initially placed roughly in the middle of the famous Wheatfield about 450 yards northeast of its current location on the east side of Brooke Avenue where it was later moved to its “line of battle” with the other monuments to the regiments of Colonel John R. Brooke’s Brigade approximately 250 yards southeast of the George Rose farm. The remnants of the original base are located in a tiny clump of brush roughly halfway between the monument to the 61st New York Infantry Regiment and the monument to Battery D of the 1st New York Light Artillery:
Here is a photo showing the original position of the monument to the 2nd Delaware Infantry Regiment (the monument to General Samuel Zook along the south side of the Wheatfield Road is visible in the background):
(Photo courtesy of the GNMP and Mike Waricher)
Here is a current photo taken in the approximate area as the photo above as well as photo of the monument on Brooke Avenue:
Yet another monument which was moved is the monument to the 5th Maine Infantry Regiment commanded by Colonel Clark S. Edwards. The monument, located roughly 50 yards north of the Wheatfield Road approximately 65 yards west of its intersection with Sedgwick Avenue north of Little Round Top, was originally located atop a rock on the northern slope of Little Round Top and roughly 200 yards south of its current position. The rock (with chisel marks still visible) can still be found roughly 75 yards west of the monument to the 121st New York Infantry Regiment (see the “Faces of the battle” section on my “Something Different” page) and 30 yards north of the monument to Battery L of the 1st Ohio Light Artillery commanded by Captain Frank C. Gibbs:
Another interesting monument which was also moved is the monument to the 16th Michigan Infantry Regiment commanded by Colonel Norval E. Welch. The monument, located on the lower “ledge” of the west side of Little Round Top, was originally placed at ground level but later moved atop a nearby boulder; the original base measuring approximately 44 inches by 88 inches can still be found roughly 15 yards southeast of the monument and on the east side of the rock wall:
For more information and photographs of the original locations of the monuments to the 2nd Delaware Infantry Regiment, the 5th Maine Infantry Regiment, and the 16th Michigan Infantry Regiment, I recommend the book “Gettysburg’s Battlefield Photographer – William H. Tipton” by Licensed Battlefield Guide Tim Smith (see my “Books Worth Reading” page”), who was extremely helpful in my search for the original rock base of the monument to the 5th Maine Infantry Regiment --- thank you very much, Tim !!!
The regiment with five monuments/markers
Many Union military units have more than one monument or marker on the battlefield (usually occurring as a result of newer and more elaborate monuments being constructed to replace an earlier one, with the original monument being moved to another location where that particular unit was also positioned during the battle). While the 95th New York Infantry Regiment (also known as the “Warren Rifles”) was not one of these units, it does have the distinction of having the most monuments/markers --- five !!!
Commanded by Colonel George H. Biddle (and then by Major Edward Pye after Biddle was wounded on July 1), the 95th New York Infantry Regiment (Second Brigade, First Division of the Union I Corps) has its monument on the east side of Reynolds Avenue monument along the south side of the famous “railroad cut”:
There are also four small stone markers on the battlefield that are often overlooked (three of them in the various areas of the fighting the regiment was involved in on July 1, and one on Culp’s Hill where it was positioned on July 2 and 3:
1. On the east side of Stone Avenue on McPherson’s Ridge roughly 50 yards north of the John Burns monument and about 10 yards off the road behind the wooden fence:
2. On the north side of Wadsworth Avenue at the 90-degree bend in the road about 200 yards east of the “T” intersection with Buford Avenue and Reynolds Avenue:
3. On Seminary Ridge at the southeast corner of the “T” intersection of the Chambersburg Pike (Route 30) and West Confederate Avenue:
4. On the east side of the summit of Culp’s Hill approximately 25 yards to the right of the monument to the 7th Indiana Infantry Regiment and about 5 yards off the road:
The “faugh a ballaugh” monument
In addition to the famous “Irish Brigade” monument (which honors the 63rd New York Infantry Regiment, the 69th New York Infantry Regiment, and the 88th New York Infantry Regiment) with the depiction of an Irish wolfhound (see the “Regimental animal mascots and monuments” section on my “Something Different” page), there is one monument nearby that contains the phrase “faugh a ballaugh”, which is a Gaelic phrase meaning “clear the way”. That monument, located roughly 50 yards further west around the bend in the loop on Sickles Avenue, is to the 28th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, another regiment in that brigade:
Yet another regiment in the Irish Brigade, the 116th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment composed primarily of Irish immigrants from Philadelphia, has its monument just 20 yards away on the other side of the road and does not have that historic phrase. I wonder why only the monument to the 28th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment has that phrase “faugh a ballaugh” ???
The monument with two bases
There are several monuments to infantry regiments of General Frank Wheaton’s Third Brigade, Third Division, of General John Sedgwick’s Union VI Corps along the east side of the dirt lane to the John Weikert farm (REMEMBER --- THE RESIDENCE IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY) located north of the "T" intersection of Wheatfield Road and Crawford Avenue. These are the monuments (in the order from south to north as you go up the lane) to the 139th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, the 93rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, the 62nd New York Infantry Regiment, the 102nd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, and the 98th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (located roughly 60 yards behind the house). These regiments were among the reinforcements sent in to the “Valley of Death” near Little Round Top on July 2.
If you look closely at the monument to the 93rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment commanded by Major John I. Nevin, you will see remnants of the original base that were removed when the original monument was replaced by a newer monument that was placed on top of the lower section of the original base:
The original monument is roughly 400 yards to the east and only 20 yards off to the west side of Sedgwick Avenue almost directly across from the equestrian monument to General John Sedgwick about 150 yards north of the intersection of Sedgwick Avenue and Sykes Avenue:
The monument (and flank markers) to the regiment that wasn’t there
While there are several markers and tablets on the battlefield to military units that were involved in the Gettysburg Campaign but not actually at the battle, there is one monument located just north of the Pennsylvania Monument on the south side of Pleasonton Avenue to the 84th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment. Commanded by Colonel Milton Opp, the regiment was guarding their division’s supply trains in Westminster, Maryland. Although that information is stated on the monument, if you look nearby, you will see something even more interesting --- flank markers for the regiment !!!
It is my understanding that the Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association, which was formed on April 30, 1864, had specific rules it adopted in 1887 for the placement of monuments, including:
VI. The monument must be on the line of battle held by the brigade unless the regiment was detached, and if possible the right and left flanks of the regiment or battery must be marked with stones not less than two feet in height.
So, why were flank markers either required or approved even though the regiment was indeed on detached duty during the battle ???
Union regiments and batteries which do not have monuments
There were several Union Army units, all part of the VI Corps, which were indeed present at the Battle of Gettysburg but do not have any monument or marker:
33rd New York Infantry Regiment
1st Rhode Island Light Artillery, Battery C
1st Rhode Island Light Artillery, Battery G
In the case of the 33rd New York Infantry Regiment, only a small detachment was present and was unofficially attached to the 49th New York Infantry Regiment. Why the Rhode Island legislation of 1885 providing for monuments at Gettysburg did not include these two artillery batteries is unknown.
The other flagpole
In addition to the flagpole on the East Cavalry Battlefield honoring Union Lieutenant William Brooke-Rawle (see the “Lesser known and visited monuments and small markers” section on my “Off the Usual Path” page), there is a flagpole on Barlow’s Knoll that marks the spot where Colonel Douglas Fowler, while commanding the 17th Connecticut Infantry Regiment on July 1, was struck and killed by an artillery shell. Located only 20 yards north of the regiment’s monument (which, by the way, has “Douglass Fowler” on it), the plaque on this flagpole, however, simply reads “ERECTED BY THE 17TH CONN. VOLS. ASS’N.” and does not mention Colonel Fowler at all:
Battle damaged structures
I would venture a guess that perhaps the most well known structure in Gettysburg that still shows battle damage is the Farnsworth House Inn
located at 401 Baltimore Street
(during the battle, it was the home of the Harvey Sweney family):
You can see many other structures with similar damage, such as the Jacob Stock house at 407 South Washington Street:
What is really interesting is that there are nine structures with artillery shells embedded in their walls (written accounts for some of the structures state that the shell is an unexploded one that was never removed, while accounts for others say the shell entered the structure but did not explode and then was later placed in the wall to commemorate the fact that the structure sustained battle damage):
George Crass-Henry Barbehenn house 218 N. Stratton St. 3-inch Reed shell
Gettysburg Female Institute 66-68 W. High St. 3-inch Reed shell
Gettysburg Methodist Parsonage 304 Baltimore St. 12-pounder cannon ball
John Kuhn house 221 N. Stratton St. 3-inch Hotchkiss shell
Moses McClean house 11 Baltimore St. 20-pounder Parrott shell
Caroline (Carrie) Sheads house 331 Buford Ave. 10-pounder Parrott shell
Samuel Schmucker house Seminary Ridge Ave. 10-pounder Parrott shell
David Troxell house 221 Chambersburg St. 3-inch Schenkl shell
Tyson Brothers photography studio 9 York St. 3-inch Hotchkiss shell
To read more about these structures, their occupants, and the artillery shells, I highly recommend the section “A Tour of Gettysburg’s Visual Battle Damage” by Licensed Battlefield Guide Tim Smith in the 1996 Volume 2 booklet entitled “Adams County History” published by the Adams County Historical Society and the Summer 2007 Edition (Volume 24, Issue 2) of the Blue & Gray Magazine (go to http://bluegraymagazine.com/store/index.html).
What's in a name
I would think that almost every Battle of Gettysburg buff knows a few of the other names that Little Round Top went by before the battle, such as "Sugar Loaf Hill” or just “Sugarloaf" or the "granite spur of Round Top", but there are many areas and geographic features that goes by more than one name.
For example, Big Round Top was once referred to as Adam Lynn’s Hill (Adam Lynn was one of the earliest settlers of the area).
Other examples include those that were given a new name as a result of a specific military officer associated with the fighting there, such as Blocher’s Knoll being referred to as Barlow’s Knoll (after General Francis C. Barlow, and McKnight’s Hill being referred to as Stevens’ Knoll (after Captain Greenleaf T. Stevens). In addition, Raffensberger’s Hill became known as East Cemetery Hill, and McPherson’s Woods is used interchangeably with Herbst’s Woods (although McPherson’s Woods is actually a little farther east).
Local features which already had more than one name include Brickyard Lane, which was also known as Winebrenner’s Lane (located east of Cemetery Hill near present-day Wainwright Avenue); another example is Stevens’ Run, also known as “the Tiber”, and runs roughly north to south and is located roughly 250 yards east of Seminary Ridge:
It is also important to realize that the Farnsworth House Inn was actually the Harvey Sweney house (see the “Battle damaged structures” section on this page) during the time of the battle, and that General Elon Farnsworth never stayed or lived there.
Town names, as is often the case, have also changed. The present-day village of Barlow (renamed for General Francis C. Barlow), located about 5 miles south of Gettysburg on the Taneytown Road, was called Horner’s Mills at the time of the battle, and the present-day village of Flora Dale, located about 9 miles north of Gettysburg just above Biglerville, was called Wrightsville and should not be confused when reading about the town of Wrightsville in nearby York County.
I wonder how many people, though, know that Culp’s Hill was at one time also called “Raspberry Hill” because of the many raspberry bushes that grew there in abundance. So the next time you are exploring Culp’s Hill, see if you can spot some of the raspberry bushes which can still be found there.
In February of 2010, I was contacted by a Civil War reenactor and semi-retired educator who emailed me the text of a July 6, 1863 New York Times article by famous Civil War newspaper correspondent Samuel Wilkeson (whose son, Lieutenant Bayard Wilkeson, was mortally wounded on July 1 on Barlow’s Knoll while commanding Battery G of the 4th U.S. Artillery). In the newspaper article, the general vicinity of the famous “copse of trees” on Cemetery Ridge is referred to as “Crow Hill” !!!
West Point graduates at the Battle of Gettysburg
One often reads about Union generals who were West Point graduates that fought against fellow classmates in the Confederate Army, but I had never really thought much about it until I received an email asking me if I knew (or could find out) exactly how many West Point graduates fought at Gettysburg. I did not know the answer, and the question was an interesting one, so I emailed Gettysburg National Park Service Ranger/Historian John Heiser. John informed me that according to a data sheet in the GNMP library files, there were 115 Union officers and 41 Confederate officers at Gettysburg who were West Point graduates. John also mailed me a copy of that data sheet, which was the basis for the charts I compiled below:
UNION WEST POINT GRADUATES
|Adams, Julius W. (Captain)
|| Hall, Norman J. (Colonel)
|| Patrick, Marsena R. (General)
|Ames, Adelbert (General)
|| Hamilton, Frank B. (Lieutenant)
|| Paul, Gabriel R. (General)
|Andrews, John N. (Captain)
|| Hancock, David P. (Captain)
|| Pennington, Alexander C. (Lieutenant)
|Ayres, Romeyn B. (General)
|| Hancock, Winfield S. (General)
|| Pettes, William H. (Colonel)
|Baker, Eugene M. (Captain)
|| Hardin, Martin D. (Colonel)
|| Platt, Edward R. (Colonel)
|Bankhead, Henry C. (Colonel)
|| Haupt, Herman (General)
|| Pleasonton, Alfred (General)
|Barlow, John W. (Lieutenant)
|| Hays, Alexander (General)
|| Poland, John S. (Colonel)
|Barnes, James (General)
|| Hays, William (General)
|| Randol, Alanson M. (Captain)
|Beaumont, Eugene B. (Captain)
|| Hazlett, Charles E. (Lieutenant)
|| Reese, Chauncey B. (Captain)
| Benham, Henry W. (General)
|| Howard, Oliver O. (General )
|| Remington, Philip H. (Lieutenant)
| Best, Clermont L. (Colonel)
|| Howe, Albion P. (General)
|| Reynolds, John F. (General)
| Bryan, Timothy (Colonel)
|| Humphreys, Andrew A. (General )
|| Ruger, Thomas H. (General)
| Buford, John (General)
|| Hunt, Henry J. (General)
|| Russell, David A. (General)
| Burbank, Sidney (Colonel)
|| Ingalls, Rufus J. (General)
|| Ryan, George (Captain)
| Bush, Edward G. (Captain)
|| Kellogg, Josiah H. (Colonel)
|| Sanderson, James A. (Lieutenant)
| Calef, John H. (Lieutenant)
|| Kent, Jacob F. (Colonel)
|| Sawtelle, Charles G. (Colonel)
| Carroll, Samuel S. (Colonel)
|| Kilpatrick, Judson (General)
|| Schaff, Morris ((Lieutenant)
| Carter, Eugene (Major)
|| Lancaster, James M. (Lieutenant)
|| Schriver, Edmund (General)
| Claflin, Ira W. (Captain)
|| Lockwood, Henry H. (General)
|| Sedgwick, John (General)
| Clarke, Henry F. (Colonel)
|| Lord, Richard S. (Captain)
|| Slocum, Henry W. (General)
| Cushing, Alonzo (Lieutenant)
|| Lynn, Daniel D. (Lieutenant)
|| Sykes, George (General)
| Custer, George A. (General)
|| Mackenzie, Ranald S. (Lieutenant)
|| Tidball, John C. (Captain)
| Davis, Benjamin F. (Colonel)
|| Martin, Leonard (Lieutenant)
|| Torbert, Alfred T. A. (General)
| Davis, Nelson H. (Major)
|| Martin, James P. (Captain)
|| Turnbull, Charles N. (Captain)
| Day, Hannibal (Colonel)
|| McCleary, John (Captain)
|| Tyler, Robert O. (General)
| Doubleday, Abner (General)
|| McCrea, Tulley (Captain)
|| Upham, John J. (Captain)
| Edie, John R. (Lieutenant)
|| McIntire, Samuel B. (Lieutenant)
|| Upton, Emory (Colonel)
| Egan, John (Lieutenant)
|| McKee, Samuel A. (Captain)
|| Warner, Charles N. (Lieutenant)
| Eustis, Henry L. (Colonel)
|| McQuesten, James F. (Lieutenant)
|| Warner, Edward R. (Colonel)
| Flagler, Daniel W. (Captain)
|| Meade, George G. (General)
|| Warren, Gouverneur K. (General)
| Floyd-Jones, Delaney (Major)
|| Mendell, George H. (Captain)
|| Watson, Malbone F. (Lieutenant)
| Freedley, Henry W. (Captain)
|| Merritt, Wesley W. (General)
|| Webb, Alexander S. (General)
| Fuller, William D. (Lieutenant)
|| Morgan, Charles H. (Colonel)
|| Weed, Stephen H. (General)
| Garrard, Kenner (Colonel)
|| Neill, Thomas H. (General)
|| Whiting, Charles J. (Major)
| Gibbon, John (General)
|| Newton, John (General)
|| Williams, Seth (General)
| Gillespie, George L. (Lieutenant)
|| Nicodemus, W. J. L. (Captain)
|| Woodruff, George A. (Lieutenant)
| Greene, George S. (General)
|| Norris, Charles E. (Captain)
|| Wright, Horatio G. (General)
| Gregg, Daniel M. (General)
|| Noyes, Henry E. (Captain)
| Griffin, Charles (General)
|| O’Rorke, Patrick H. (Colonel)
CONFEDERATE WEST POINT GRADUATES
| Alexander, E. Porter (Colonel)
|| Heth, Henry (General)
|| McCreery, Jr., William (Captain)
| Anderson, Richard H. (General)
|| Hill, Ambrose P. (General)
|| Mercer, John T. (Colonel)
| Baker, Laurence S. (Colonel)
|| Hood, John B. (General)
|| Pender, William D. (General)
| Beckham, Robert F. (Major)
|| Huger, Frank (Major)
|| Pendleton, William N. (General)
| Bryan, Goode (Colonel)
|| Johnson, Edward (General)
|| Pickett, George E. (General)
| Chambliss, John R. (Colonel)
|| Jones, John M. (General)
|| Ramseur, Stephen D. (General)
| Cole, Robert G. (Colonel)
|| Jones, William E. (General)
|| Robertson, Beverly H. (General)
| Corley, James L. (Colonel)
|| Lee, Fitzhugh (General)
|| Smead, Abner (Colonel)
| Daniel, Junius (General)
|| Lee, Robert E. (General)
|| Smith, W. Proctor (Colonel)
| Davis, J. Lucius (Colonel)
|| Lomax, Lunsford L. (Colonel)
|| Steuart, George H. (General)
| Early, Jubal A. (General)
|| Long, Armistead L. (Colonel)
|| Stuart, James E. B. (General)
| Ewell, Richard S. (General)
|| Longstreet, James P. (General)
|| Trimble, Isaac R. (General)
| Garnett, Richard B. (General)
|| McLaws, Lafayette (General)
|| Wilcox, Cadmus M. (General)
| Henry, Mathias W. (Major)
|| Magruder, William T. (Captain)
Virginia Military Institute graduates at the Battle of Gettysburg
The Virginia Military Institute, founded in Lexington, Virginia in 1839, is often referred to as the “West Point of the South”. Listed below is a list of VMI graduates who were at the Battle of Gettysburg:
|Allen, Robert C. (Colonel)
||Hambrick, Joseph A. (Major)
||Patton, Waller T. (Colonel)
|Baldwin, Briscoe G. (Colonel)
||Hannah, George B. (Lieutenant)
||Phillips, James J. (Captain)
|Bell, Robert F. (Captain)
||Harrison, Walter H. (Major)
|| Pitzer, Andrew L. (Lieutenant)
|Bentley, William W. (Captain)
||Heth, Stockton (Lieutenant)
|| Powell, William L. (Captain)
|Berkeley, Edmund (Major)
||Hill, Francis T. (Captain)
|| Pryor, William H. (Major)
|Berkeley, Norborne (Colonel)
||Hill, John W. (Lieutenant)
||Randolph, William L. (Lieutenant)
|Boyd, Waller M. (Captain)
||Hutter, James R. (Captain)
||Rodes, Robert E. (General)
|Bray, William H. (Captain)
||James, John T. (Lieutenant)
||Selden, Miles C. Jr. (Lieutenant)
|Brown, Benjamin Jr. (Captain)
||Jones, Charles H. (Lieutenant)
||Smith, Frederick W. (Lieutenant)
| Burgwyn, Henry Jr. (Colonel)
||Jones, John W. (Captain)
||Smith, George H. (Colonel)
| Cabell, Henry C. (Colonel)
||Kyle, George G. (Captain)
||Smith, Thomas H. (Lieutenant)
|Callcote, Alexander D. (Colonel)
||Lane, James H. (General)
||Stockton, John N. C. (Adjutant)
|Carter, Edward (Captain)
||Latimer, Joseph W. (Major)
||Stuart, William D. (Colonel)
|Carter, Thomas H. (Colonel)
||Logan, Richard, Jr. (Captain)
||Taliaferro, William T. (Lieutenant)
|Carrington, Henry A. (Colonel)
||Macon, Miles C. (Captain)
||Terry, William R. (Colonel)
|Chamberlain, George (Captain)
||Mahone, William (General)
||Turner, Thomas, T. (Lieutenant)
|Coleman, Henry E. (Colonel)
||Marshall, James K. (Colonel)
||Walker, James A. (General)
|Darden, James D. (Captain)
||Mayo, Joseph M. (Colonel)
||Walker, Reuben L. (Colonel)
|Edmonds, Edward C. (Colonel)
||Mayo, Robert M. (Colonel)
||Walthall, James A. (Lieutenant)
|Ellis, John T. (Colonel)
||McCulloch, Robert (Captain)
||Ward, John C. (Captain)
|Eyster, George H. (Captain)
||Munford, Thomas T. (Colonel)
||Watson, John D. (Captain)
|Flowerree, Charles C. (Colonel)
||Moore, Charles W. (Lieutenant)
||Wharton, Richard G. (Lieutenant)
|Fry, William T. (Captain)
||Morrison, Joseph G. (Lieutenant)
||Whiting, Henry A. (Major)
|Gantt, Henry (Colonel)
||Niemeyer, John C. (Lieutenant)
||Williams, Lewis (Colonel)
|Gilliam, Joseph S. (Lieutenant)
||Norton, George F. (Captain)
||Williamson, William G. (Lieutenant)
|Griggs, George K. (Captain)
||Otey, Kirkwood (Major)
||Wingfield, John S. (Lieutenant)
|Grigsby, Benjamin P. (Lieutenant)
||Paxton, James G. (Major)
||Wilson, Nathaniel C. (Major)
In addition, Abner C. Beckham served as a volunteer aide-de-camp to General James Kemper, Rodes, Virginius H. Rodes served as a volunteer aide-de-camp to General Robert Rodes (his brother), and that James D. Hunter served with the rank of “cadet” at General Robert E. Lee’s headquarters. It is my understanding that this rank of “cadet” allowed very young men to serve in a sense as “apprentices” on the staffs of generals.
It should also be noted that Colonel Birkett D. Fry of the 13th Alabama Infantry Regiment (in General James Archer’s Brigade) attended but did not graduate from VMI, as was also the case of Major Walter H. Taylor of General Robert E. Lee's staff (in the book "Lee's Adjutant: the Wartime Letters of Colonel Walter Herron Taylor", it says Taylor was forced to drop out after two years upon the death of his father but was later made an honorary member). Colonel William H. F. Payne of the 2nd North Carolina Cavalry Regiment (who was captured on June 30 during the Battle of Hanover), did not graduate from VMI but was also later made an honorary member. (My sincere thanks to Michael King for his extensive research on this interesting topic !!!)
The other railroad cuts
Any student of the battle is well aware of the famous “railroad cut” north of the Chambersburg Pike, but little is mentioned of the importance of two other “cuts” which played a role in the hard-fought action on the morning and afternoon of July 1. The well-known railroad cut is actually the center cut, and is the area where the 6th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment, part of General Solomon Meredith’s First Brigade (“The Iron Brigade”) of General James S. Wadsworth’s First Division of the Union I Corps, along with the 95th New York Infantry Regiment and the 14th Brooklyn Infantry Regiment (also known as the 84th New York Infantry Regiment) of General Lysander Cutler’s Second Brigade of that division, attacked northward across the Chambersburg Pike and routed the 2nd Mississippi Infantry Regiment and the 42nd Mississippi Infantry Regiment, two of the four regiments of General Joseph R. Davis’ Brigade of General Henry Heth’s Division of General A. P. Hill’s III Corps. The Union attack resulted in the capture of more than 200 Confederate soldiers who had taken cover in the railroad cut:
(view from the eastern cut looking west toward the center cut)
The western cut, located roughly 250 yards west of the center cut, is the area where the 149th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, one of the three regiments in Colonel Roy Stone’s Second Brigade of General Thomas A. Rowley’s Third Division of the Union I Corps, used the northern lip of the cut as a firing platform to inflict damage on the 45th North Carolina Infantry Regiment and the 2nd North Carolina Infantry Battalion, two of the five units in General Junius Daniel’s Brigade of General Robert E. Rodes’ Division in General Richard S. Ewell’s II Corps, as they advanced as the right flank of the brigade in their assault on Union troops on Oak Ridge. After soon being forced out of the cut by Confederate artillery fire, the 149th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment later made a charge and forced the 45th North Carolina Infantry Regiment and the 2nd North Carolina Infantry Battalion out of the same railroad cut which they occupied after that Union regiment had been forced to withdraw:
(view of the western cut from the southeast)
(view of the western cut from the
north side of the center cut)
(view of the western cut looking west)
(view of the north side of the western cut)
The eastern cut, located roughly 275 yards east of the center cut, is the area where the remnants of the 16th Maine Infantry Regiment commanded by Colonel Charles W. Tilden surrendered on the afternoon of July 1 after being sacrificed to serve as a “rear guard” for the rest of their brigade (General Gabriel R. Paul’s First Brigade of General John C. Robinson’s Second Division of the Union I Corps) and allow their fellow soldiers to retreat toward town and Cemetery Hill. An interesting and often overlooked fact is that the soldiers of the 16th Maine Infantry Regiment tore their flag into pieces and hid the shreds among themselves in order to keep it from falling into Confederate hands (see the “Miscellaneous small markers” section on my “Off the Usual Path” page):
(view from the east end of the center cut
looking toward the eastern cut)
(view of the eastern cut looking east toward town)
Flank markers are commonplace on the battlefield but are often overlooked despite their importance for those studying the movement and positions of a particular regiment. In addition to their importance, they are also interesting in themselves. While it is understandable that most (but not all) infantry regiments would have flank markers, some (but not all) batteries have them as well. In addition, despite the fact that the positions of cavalry units were obviously more fluid, some (but not all) cavalry units also have flank markers. It is important to note that not all flank markers mark the exact location of a unit's flanks due to the sheer distances involved (for example, normal spacing between cannons on the firing line was roughly 14 yards, and Union batteries normally had 6 cannons).
Among other things, the size, shape, amount of inscription and detail, and height above the ground of flank markers also varies. Generally speaking, though, there does appear to be two most common shapes: the square marker with the flat top and the square marker with the pointed top:
Examples of just a few of the other shapes include those of the 137th New York Infantry Regiment on Culp's Hill (see the photo below on the left) and those of the 12th New Hampshire Infantry Regiment on the east side of the Emmitsburg Road (see the photo below on the right):
In addition, the flank markers for Massachusetts infantry regiments are larger and with a more rectangular shape that includes a pointed top:
Perhaps the most unusual shape for flank markers has to be those that are in the shape of a tree stump for the 90th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (see the "Unusual monuments" section on my "Something Different" page):
In regard to the amount of inscription and detail, some simply have initials such as "LF" or "L.F." or "LEFT FLANK" or "LEFT" while others also identify which regiment and occasionally have their Union Corps symbol as well:
I know of at least one set of flank markers, those of the 14th Indiana Infantry Regiment on East Cemetery Hill along the west side of Wainwright Avenue, that includes brief text as well:
What is also interesting is that the monument to the 14th Indiana Infantry Regiment is nowhere near the flank markers and is located about 100 yards to the west and up on the crest of East Cemetery Hill near the equestrian monument to General Winfield S. Hancock. The left flank marker is to the north of the monument to the 153rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment and the right flank marker is to the south of the monument to the 41st New York Infantry Regiment.
The reason for this is that the 14th Indiana Infantry Regiment and other regiments of their brigade commanded by Colonel Samuel S. Carroll in the Union II Corps were rushed over from their positions on Cemetery Ridge to help repulse the Confederate attack by troops commanded by General Harry T. Hays and Colonel Isaac E. Avery on East Cemetery Hill on the evening of July 2. These flank markers indicate the regiment’s furthermost point reached in their counterattack as well as indicating the position where they remained for the remainder of the battle. The monument to the 14th Indiana Infantry Regiment was originally placed between the flank markers but later moved to its original “line of battle” position on the crest of East Cemetery Hill with monuments of their “sister” regiments.
The height above the ground of the flank markers also varies, sometimes even of those to the same regiment, as in the case of those of the 23rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment on the left side of Slocum Avenue as you head up Culp's Hill:
I know of two regiments that have a third flank marker in addition to the standard left flank and right flank markers. The 13th New Jersey Infantry Regiment, whose monument is located southeast of Spangler's Spring south of Culp's Hill along the west side of Carmen Avenue, has a left center flank marker located roughly 30 yards north of the monument and on the other side of the road:
Another regiment with a third flank marker is the 15th New Jersey Infantry Regiment, who does not have their own monument but is commemorated by the monument to the First New Jersey Brigade, located roughly 65 yards off to the east side of Sedgwick Avenue south of the intersection with United States Avenue (see the "Faces of the battle" section on my "Something Different" page). There is a right center flank marker located roughly 60 yards north of the monument and on the east side of a "T" stone wall, and it also serves as the right flank marker for the 2nd New Jersey Infantry Regiment (if you look carefully, the "15" may appear to be a "16", but that is due to the aging/chipping of the marker:
This brings us to the subject of "shared" flank markers, and I know of several others, including the one nearby along the south side of the stone wall that serves as the left flank marker for the 1st New Jersey Infantry Regiment and as the right flank marker for the 15th New Jersey Infantry Regiment (as mentioned above, if you look carefully, the "15" may appear to be a "16", but that is due to the aging/chipping of the marker):
Also nearby along the south side of the same stone wall is the one that serves as the left flank marker for the 2nd New Jersey Regiment and as the right flank marker for the 3rd New Jersey Infantry Regiment:
Several New York regiments also "share" flank markers, such as the one on Cemetery Ridge along the east side of Hancock Avenue about 100 yards north of The Angle. This one serves as the left flank marker for the 125th New York Infantry Regiment and as the right flank marker for the 39th New York Infantry Regiment:
Another example is that of the one on East Cemetery Hill along the west side of Wainwright Avenue that serves as the left flank marker for the 68th New York Infantry Regiment and as the right flank marker for the 54th New York Infantry Regiment:
Other "shared" flank markers occur between regiments from different states, such as the one for the 147th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment and the 5th Ohio Infantry Regiment roughly 20 yards south of the monument to the 147th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (see the photo below on the left) in the southwest corner of the intersection of Wheatfield Road and Sykes Avenue just north of Little Round Top. The inscription for the 5th Ohio Infantry Regiment is clearly visible on the south side of the marker, but you have go around to the back to the west side to see the inscription for the 147th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (see the photo below on the right):
What is also interesting is that neither side of the marker indicates whether it was the right flank or the left flank of that regiment, and that the other flank marker for the 147th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment located roughly 10 yards north of the monument also has no inscription as to which flank it was. Perhaps the surviving veterans felt it was simply understood which was which ???
Another example is the one west of the Wheatfield just north of the Loop on Sickles Avenue and is located roughly 30 yards off the road about halfway between the monument to the 1st Michigan Infantry Regiment and the monument to the 118th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment. Both regiments have their own left flank and right flank markers nearby as well as this "shared" marker:
Looking for flank markers can often be perplexing, since some of them have disappeared over time due to being damaged by storms, accidents, or being removed due to road widening or other reasons. In some instances, a regimental monument itself may represent the position of one of the flanks. One such monument is the monument to the 68th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment located along the north side of the Wheatfield Road across from the Peach Orchard. The inscription that is on the front of the monument reads "THIS MONUMENT MARKS THE LEFT OF THE REGIMENT WHILE SUPPORTING CLARK'S BATTERY JULY 2, 1863":
There is a similar monument but interestingly enough, it marks the position of not the left or right flank but of the left center of a regiment. The monument to the 14th Connecticut Infantry Regiment, located on Cemetery Ridge along the west side of Hancock Avenue across the road from the equestrian monument to General George G. Meade, contains an inscription on its south side that reads "LEFT CENTRE OF REGT.":
Another similar monument is the monument to the 28th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment (also featured further above on this page) located on the western edge of the Wheatfield on the south side of the upper portion of the loop on Sickles Avenue. The words “RIGHT FLANK” are inscribed at the bottom of the monument, and yet there is also a small “Right Flank” marker only a few feet away:
Located south of the Wheatfield in the southeast corner of the intersection of Sickles Avenue and Ayres Avenue is the monument to the 5th New Hampshire Infantry Regiment; the left flank marker located roughly 60 yards directly south of the monument is “ALL LEFT”:
There is a set of flank markers that are interesting for an entirely different and unusual reason. The monument and the flank markers for the 8th New York Cavalry Regiment are located on McPherson's Ridge along the east side of Reynolds Avenue and just south of the Chambersburg Pike. However, if you look closely, you will notice that the monument in the middle of the flank markers is not that of the 8th New York Cavalry Regiment but that of the 8th Illinois Cavalry Regiment ---- the monument to the 8th New York Cavalry Regiment was originally placed in the wrong position and was later moved approximately .2 of a mile further south, but the flank markers were never moved or removed:
Another set of interesting and confusing flank markers are those of Captain Robert H. Fitzhugh's Battery K, 1st New York Light Artillery. The monument was originally located near the northeast corner of Hancock and Pleasonton Avenues, but was later moved around 1903 approximately .4 of a mile to the north roughly 100 yards north of The Angle on the east side of Hancock Avenue. The flank markers, however, still remain at their original positions on either side of Pleasonton Avenue:
(Image from the “Final Report on the Battlefield of Gettysburg by the New York
Monuments Commission for the Battlefields of Gettysburg and Chattanooga”)
It is my understanding that Captain Fitzhugh personally paid for the relocation of the monument once it was acknowledged to be in the wrong position. I wonder why they didn't bother to move the flank markers ???
There is at least one flank marker that has its own unique mystery --- it is completely blank !!! Located right along the west side of the Emmitsburg Road in front of the Joseph Sherfy house and roughly 15 yards north of the monument to the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, one could make an argument that it must be the right flank marker for that regiment, but I have yet to find a corresponding left flank marker near the monument, marked or unmarked, on that side of the road -- the monument to the 57th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment just to the north has both their flank markers, and the clearly marked left flank marker a short distance to the north on the east side of the road is understood to be for the monument to the 105th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment. So therein lies the mystery --- it sure looks like a flank marker, but for which regiment and why is it blank ???
Then there are the flank markers for the 84th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, located on either side of the monument along the south side of Pleasonton Avenue on Cemetery Ridge. The only problem is, the regiment was never on the battlefield but was guarding their division's supply trains in Westminster, Maryland (see the "The monument (and flank markers) to the regiment that wasn’t there" section on this page). And finally, there are the small stone bases that appear to be flank markers but aren't flank markers at all. Located on East Cemetery Hill right along the east side of the Baltimore Pike directly across from the entrance to the Evergreen Cemetery are six small stone bases for the cannonball and chain fencing during much earlier times and used in various areas of the park to delineate roadways from Park land like a curbstone would today:
(Photo courtesy of the GNMP and Steve Floyd)
So, while it is always important and interesting to look at and learn from the monuments on the battlefield, perhaps you will take the time to investigate the nearby flank markers -- they are important and interesting in their own right !!!
Chasseurs and Zouaves
While Civil War buffs are familiar with Zouave regiments, there was also another type of French-inspired military unit with similar looking uniforms, the Chasseurs, and four Union regiments with such a designation participated in the Battle of Gettysburg. They were the 65th New York Infantry Regiment, the 84th New York Infantry Regiment (also known as the 14th Brooklyn Infantry Regiment), the 62nd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, and the 83rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (and which is sometimes mistakenly referred to as a Zouave regiment). Of these regiments, only the 84th New York Infantry Regiment (14th Brooklyn Infantry Regiment) was still wearing their uniquely designed Chasseur uniforms by the time of the Battle of Gettysburg. The others had discarded the Chasseur uniforms, most of which had come from France as a gift to the Federal government, due to sizing and fitting difficulties.
Only one Union regimental monument, however, actually has the word “Chasseurs” (the French word, in essence, for “Light Infantry”) inscribed on it -- the monument to the 65th New York Infantry Regiment located on Culp’s Hill about one-half of the way up from Spangler’s Spring on the left side of Slocum Avenue roughly 100 yards past the statue of General John W. Geary:
There were ten Union Zouave regiments that participated in the Battle of Gettysburg: the 10th New York Infantry Regiment, the 41st New York Infantry Regiment, the 44th New York Infantry Regiment, the 73rd New York Infantry Regiment, the 146th New York Infantry Regiment, the 23rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, the 72nd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, the 95th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, and the 155th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (which did not become a Zouave regiment until 1864).
Many of the regiments had discarded all or most of their colorful Zouave uniforms by the summer of 1863 for the standard Union uniform, but generally speaking, three regiments did appear in full Zouave or Zouave-inspired uniforms at the Battle of Gettysburg: the 84th New York Infantry Regiment (14th Brooklyn Infantry Regiment), the 146th New York Infantry Regiment, and the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, while a few others wore a “mix” (like the 95th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, which had retained only the Zouave jacket). Of course, there were no doubt exceptions to the rule in each and every regiment.
On the Confederate side, the “Louisiana Tigers” of General Harry T. Hays’ Brigade in General Jubal A. Early’s Division of General Richard S. Ewell’s II Corps is often mistakenly believed that they wore Zouave uniforms at the Battle of Gettysburg, but that was not the case although the original “Louisiana Tigers” of Major Chatham R. Wheat’s Battalion did wear them earlier in the war. (A personal note: my sincere thanks to NPS Park Ranger/Historian John Heiser for his assistance and detailed information provided for this interesting topic of Chasseurs and Zouaves -- thank you very much, John !!!)
A vivandiere (or vivandere) was a combination nurse, cook, seamstress, and laundress who travelled with the Zouaves. Vivandieres appeared in European armies, especially in France, as women who were part of a regiment and provided the sale of spirits and other comforts, and attended to the sick. The women were known to wear the uniform of the regiment. Generally speaking, a vivandiere adopted the style of clothing of her regiment, but with men's pants under a knee-length skirt and usually carried a cask (slung over a shoulder) which was generally filled with water, wine, or brandy. Most vivandieres were sent home when the heavy fighting started, but there was at least one exception at the Battle of Gettysburg: Marie Brose Tepe of the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (“Collis’ Zouaves”).
Also known as “French Mary”, she is considered the only enlisted woman at Gettysburg, where she carried water and treated the wounded during the heaviest of the fighting. She was in 13 battles, and carried a .44 caliber pistol. From the book “Women at Gettysburg" by E. J. Conklin, “When the regiment was not in action, she cooked, washed, mended for the men. She drew the pay of a soldier and was allowed 25 cents per day extra for hospital and headquarters services, maker her pay $21.45 per month for over two years. Then some friction in the Paymaster's Department about the enlistment of women stopped her pay, but did not dampen her patriotism."
For several weeks following the Battle of Gettysburg, “French Mary” served as a nurse in a field hospital located on the Taneytown Road. She then went back to her regiment, and it is believed that “French Mary” was still with the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment in Washington, D.C. for the Grand Review of the Union Army held on May 23, 1865, followed by the mustering out of the regiment a few days later.
(1863 photo of “French Mary” Tepe by the Tyson Brothers Studio in Gettysburg)
A grave topic
While not specifically tied to the Battle of Gettysburg, two fellow members of the York Civil War Roundtable pointed out to me in 2009 an interesting G.A.R. grave marker at Mount Olivet Cemetery in Hanover, Pennsylvania. While I was well aware of the more common G.A.R. marker in the shape of a five-pointed star (shown in the photo below on the left), I had never seen one in the shape of a Civil War canteen (shown in the photo below on the right):
Another canteen-shaped marker was found by those same members in the Red Mount United Methodist Church cemetery near East Berlin, Pennsylvania, as well as other similar canteen-shaped markers that they found in March of 2010 in Fairview Cemetery in Wrightsville, Pennsylvania, that contained the name of the G.A.R. Post:
I also discovered other variations of the G.A.R. five-pointed star and other interesting markers at http://www.usgwarchives.net/pa/1pa/tscarvers/veteran-markers/veteran-markers-civil-war.htm, which also included photographs of two types of Confederate markers, one of which is shown in the photo below at the grave of General Lafayette McLaws located in Laurel Grove Cemetery in Savannah, Georgia:
(Photo courtesy of Ed Doadt)
The most interesting grave marker I have seen so far was also one that my two fellow members of the York Civil War Roundtable discovered in Fairview Cemetery:
Sergeant Charles D. Marquette was a member of the 93rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment (see the “The monument with two bases” section on my “More Odds and Ends” page) and is listed on the Pennsylvania Monument (spelled as “CHAS MARQUETT”) as being on the regimental roster at Gettysburg; he was awarded the Medal of Honor for gallantry in action at the Battle of Petersburg in April of 1865.
Here is a photo submitted by Mark Leik of a different type of G.A.R. grave marker at the John McGarah Post 132 in Portland, Michigan:
I am continuing my research on Civil War grave markers, and if anyone else has also seen these canteen-shaped markers or any other different style Civil War grave marker, please email me at email@example.com. Thanks !!!
An Australian in Pickett’s Charge?
As all Civil War buffs know, the ranks of both armies were comprised of not only American-born citizens (and occasionally Native American Indians as well) but also hundreds of thousands of immigrants from many, many nations (I have read of estimates of approximately 500,000 foreign-born soldiers in the Union Army and approximately 100,000 foreign-born soldiers in the Confederate Army).
The largest groups were from Germany, Ireland, and England, but there were soldiers from a multitude of other countries, including Canada, Italy, France, Scotland, Russia, Hungary, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, and Portugal. In fact, the 39th New York Infantry Regiment (also known as the “Garibaldi Guards”) was originally comprised of three German Companies, three Hungarian Companies, one Italian Company, one Swiss Company, one French Company, and one Company of Spaniards and Portuguese. The Spanish/Portuguese Company also had individuals from Cuba, Nicaragua and Chile.
According to Civil War historian/author Thomas L. Elmore (who graciously allowed me to share the following information), approximately 28,000 Union troops (roughly one out of every four soldiers) and about 3,500 Confederate troops at Gettysburg were born in another country. Here are just a few of his examples:
Private Richard Flanagan (72nd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment) -- Australia
Private Albert Oss (11th New Jersey Infantry Regiment) -- Belgium
Assistant Adjutant General Francis L. Price (to General Jerome Robertson) -- Ceylon (Sri Lanka)
Lieutenant Colonel Federico Fernandez Cavada (114th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment) -- Cuba
Private George D. Lustin (15th Louisiana Infantry Regiment) -- Indonesia or India
Private Jose Antonio Candida (10th Louisiana Infantry Regiment) -- Mexico
Private Thomas R. Morris (15th Alabama Infantry Regiment) -- New Zealand
Private Nichole Danilovich (10th Louisiana Infantry Regiment) -- Russia
First Sergeant George T. Chase (2nd Massachusetts Infantry Regiment) -- South Africa
In addition, Chinese immigrants served in the Union Navy, and some researchers estimate that approximately 50 served in the Union Army with at least a few serving in the Confederate Army. At least two Chinese soldiers (who often adopted American names) who fought at the Battle of Gettysburg were Private Joseph L. Pierce of the 14th Connecticut Infantry Regiment and Corporal John Tommy/Tomny/Tomney of the 70th New York Infantry Regiment (who lost both legs in the fighting on July 2 and eventually died of his wounds).
Which brings us to the question: was there an Australian in Pickett’s Charge? Private William Mitchel of the 1st Virginia Infantry Regiment was one of the many soldiers killed during Pickett’s Charge. One of three sons born to Irish patriot John Mitchel, who had been exiled to Tasmania, Australia, by the British government around 1850, William lived there with his family until they all escaped by ship with several other exiles, eventually arriving in New York City in 1853. When the Civil War broke out, John moved his family to Richmond, Virginia, working as a newspaper editor and served in the Ambulance Corps. All of the sons enlisted in the Confederate Army: John Jr. enlisted in the 1st South Carolina Permanent (Light) Artillery, and James and William enlisted in the 1st Virginia Infantry Regiment.
Private William Mitchel was hastily buried by his comrades on the Nicholas Codori farm with his name on a piece of paper fastened to a piece of board to mark his grave. Sadly, the Codori family did not bother to maintain any of the grave markers on the farm, and Private Mitchel’s remains were disinterred with others in 1872 and sent in the second shipment to Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond. Private William Mitchel, of Ireland and Australia, is interred in the Gettysburg section of that cemetery as an “Unknown” !!! (A personal note: my sincere thanks to NPS Park Ranger/Historian John Heiser for his assistance and detailed information provided regarding Private William Mitchel -- thank you very much, John !!!)
The other Gettysburgs
In addition to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, there are two other Gettysburgs in the United States. One of them is Gettysburg, Ohio, with a current population of approximately 500 people. Located in Darke County, the village of Gettysburg was founded by natives of Adams County, Pennsylvania in the late 1820’s and officially adopted its now-famous name in 1842.
The other municipality is Gettysburg, South Dakota, with a current population of approximately 1,000 people. Located in Potter County, its nickname is “Where the Battle Wasn’t”, but it does have a strong connection to that Civil War battle.
In early 1883, a joint stock company was formed to establish a colony for Civil War veterans in Potter County, South Dakota (at that time, it was the Dakota Territory). The first permanent settlers arrived on May 21, 1883, including veterans O. L. Mann, J. Q. Walker, J. B. Weeks, James Bryson, K. W. Pearce, Asheal Todd, and several others.
The first choice for the name of the new town was “Meade”, but it was rejected by the United States Post Office Department due presumably to another town with or applying for the same name; the second choice, which has long since been forgotten, was also rejected.
The third choice, “Gettysburg”, was suggested by former Captain John W. Kennedy of the 134th New York Infantry Regiment, who had fought at Gettysburg. A review of historical records provided by the Dakota Sunset Museum of Gettysburg, South Dakota includes the following settlers of that town and/or county of former Union Army soldiers (or their relatives) whose regiments saw action at the Battle of Gettysburg:
|| 5th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
|| 24th Michigan Infantry Regiment
| George Carver
|| 5th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
| Charles Dean
|| 20th Indiana Infantry Regiment
|| 3rd and 26th Wisconsin Infantry Regiments
| Nicholas Frankhauser
|| 8th Ohio Infantry Regiment
| David Goodnow
|| 8th New Jersey Infantry Regiment
|| 140th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment
| George Hammel
|| 15th U.S. Infantry Regiment and 43rd New York Infantry Regiment
| Benjamin Hart
|| 2nd Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
| Hudson Jack
|| 3rd Massachusetts Infantry Regiment
| Elpinston Kent
|| 8th Illinois Cavalry Regiment
| Almond McLaughlin
|| 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment
| Conrad Miller
|| 55th Ohio Infantry Regiment
| Albert Moulton
|| 37th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment
| Andrew Murdy
|| 1st West Virginia Cavalry Regiment
| Amos Newland*
|| 17th U.S. Infantry Regiment
| James Rodenhurst
|| 146th New York Infantry Regiment
| Moses Slawso
|| 107th New York Infantry Regiment
| James Som(m)erville
|| 5th New Jersey Infantry Regiment
| William Trumbull
|| 65th New York Infantry Regiment
| David Warner
|| 134th New York Infantry Regiment
| Frederick Warner
|| 7th Ohio Infantry Regiment
| Charles Welch
|| 19th Indiana Infantry Regiment
| William Whitford
|| 5th Michigan Cavalry Regiment
| William Wright
|| 12th Illinois Cavalry Regiment
| Frank Young
|| 6th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
| *killed at the Battle of Gettysburg on July 2, 1863
Eventually, roughly 180 Union Army veterans settled in Potter County, home of Gettysburg, South Dakota. The historical records also indicate approximately 70 Confederate Army veterans settled in South Dakota, but none in the town of Gettysburg. One wonders if the name of the town was the reason, doesn’t it? A final note about Captain John W. Kennedy, who died there in 1918: on his tombstone, the following phrase is carved --- “He fought at Gettysburg and he died at Gettysburg” !!!
“Those damned wagons …”
One of the many controversies surrounding the Battle of Gettysburg involves, of all things, captured Union supply wagons. As most Civil War history buffs know, as Confederate General J.E.B. Stuart moved behind Union lines on his way north to link up with General Richard S. Ewell’s II Corps, he encountered an opportunity on June 28 near Rockville, Maryland to attack and/or capture a large Union supply train consisting of 150 wagons. Knowing that one of his military objectives was to collect provisions along with information, Stuart attacked and captured 125 of the 150 Union supply wagons (25 were damaged and/or destroyed). There is no doubt that bringing those wagons with him slowed General Stuart’s cavalry as they advanced northward, but how much of a role this decision played in causing the Confederate Army to lose the Battle of Gettysburg is debated to this very day.
What is overlooked is the interesting fact that these wagons were possibly made by wagon makers John, Henry and Clem Studebaker, who were born just 3 miles north of Hunterstown, which is roughly 7 miles north of Gettysburg. Their father began building carriages and wagons in 1830 in his nearby shop and later moved his family to South Bend, Indiana. His sons carried on the family tradition, forming H. & C. Studebaker in 1852. The company was one of the businesses with contracts with the U.S. government to build wagons and other equipment during the Civil War. I believe I read somewhere that over 600,000 Union wagons were built by all the contractors combined --- what are the odds that those 125 wagons would be captured and then perhaps travel past the very area where the wagon makers were born? That would be a truly ironic example, both figuratively and literally, of “what goes around, comes around …”
A tale of two spies
During the early morning hours of June 28, 1863, Union General George Gordon Meade was appointed commander of the Army of the Potomac while at his corps headquarters near Frederick, Maryland. Later that same day, a spy brought news about the location of Meade's army to Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, a distance of fifty miles, where Confederate General Robert E. Lee and General James Longstreet were headquartered. Based solely on that information, Lee ordered his dispersed army to move immediately toward a small crossroads town in south-central Pennsylvania. Thus was the beginning of the historic three-day battle known as Gettysburg.
That spy was Henry T. (Thomas) Harrison, whose full identity was not known until 1986 when historian James O. Hall uncovered information in the Civil War records at the National Archives. Later research by Mr. Hall proved conclusively that Harrison did appear on stage in Richmond on a bet but he was anything but a professional actor. Born near Nashville, Tennessee in 1832, Harrison joined the 12th Mississippi Infantry Regiment in the spring of 1861 as a private, but in November of 1861 he was discharged and eventually became a Confederate spy. Eventually assigned to General Longstreet in March of 1863, Harrison was dispatched to spy for General D.H. Hill in North Carolina and captured by Union soldiers but eventually convinced his captors that he was an innocent civilian avoiding conscription. Reporting back to General Longstreet in April of 1863, Harrison performed his duty admirably as a spy which culminated in his now-famous report on June 28 that so dramatically affected the Gettysburg Campaign.
Released from duty in September of 1863, Harrison soon married Laura Broders in, of all places, Washington, D.C., and after traveling to New York for their honeymoon, he continued his espionage activities in Washington, D.C. and New York for the remainder of the war, dying in 1923 in Covington, Kentucky at the age of 91.
(Image courtesy of Bernie Becker)
Another Confederate spy during the Gettysburg Campaign, however, was not so fortunate. Written accounts from Union soldiers on July 5, 1863 tell the story of pickets
outside of Frederick, Maryland observing a civilian on horseback apparently taking notes. When challenged by the pickets, the man attempted to escape but was soon captured by Union cavalry. He was discovered to have accurate descriptions and drawings indicating the positions of Union forces located at Frederick, Monocacy and Harpers Ferry as well as several military passes signed by both Union and Confederate officers. The man has been tentatively identified by George Brigham of Middletown, Maryland as George William Richardson, a man about sixty years old from Baltimore and who was recognized by many Union soldiers as a sutler who had been coming into their camps as early as 1862. According to Union soldier Abner N. Hard in “History of the Eighth Cavalry Regiment, Illinois Volunteers”:
“He confessed to having just come from the rebel lines, but said he had been to visit his three sons, who were in the Confederate service. General Buford carefully examined the papers, and then said "hang him." No further trial was had. A few moments were given him to prepare to die, in which he tried to make his escape, but was recaptured. A rope was placed around his neck, one end thrown over the limb of a tree, and three soldiers drew him, fastened the rope and left him dangling in the air.”
On orders by General John Buford, the following note was pinned to Richardson’s body:
"Tried, convicted and hung as a spy.
Any one cutting down this body without orders will take his place .
order of Major-General John Buford, Commanding Cavalry"
George Richardson’s body remained suspended for three or four days before his body was cut down and buried beneath the tree. Passersby reportedly took his clothes and even bark from the tree as souvenirs. Richardson's brother, Thomas, asked to take the body home, but was refused. According to recent research by George Brigham of Middletown, Maryland, when Richardson’s widow died in 1906, she left a burial plot empty so he could be placed next to her. However, they never re-interred his body and apparently is still buried where he was hanged. What entirely different endings for Henry Thomas Harrison and George William Richardson in “a tale of two spies” !!!
The Gettysburg National Military Park Commission Annual Reports
Not long after the Battle of Gettysburg was over, efforts were begun to preserve the land on which so many valiant soldiers fought and died. Led by Gettysburg lawyer David McConaughy, land acquired through personal funds ultimately led to the creation of the Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association, which was incorporated on April 30, 1864 by an Act of the Pennsylvania Legislature. Years later, Secretary of War Daniel S. Lamont appointed a three-member Gettysburg National Military Park Commission on May 25, 1893 and federal legislation initiated by New York Congressman Daniel E. Sickles officially created the Gettysburg National Military Park on February 11, 1895, transferring all assets and debts of the Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association to the U.S. government.
Administration of the newly-created park was now under the auspices of the War Department with the three-member Gettysburg National Military Park Commission (the original members were John P. Nicholson, John B. Bachelder, and William H. Forney) responsible for the supervision, maintenance, and improvement of the park. One of the annual requirements of the chairman of this commission was to submit an annual report at the end of each fiscal year to the Secretary of War. These reports are an invaluable resource for serious historians and buffs alike, providing written and photographic evidence as well as statistical data of how the Gettysburg National Military Park evolved from 1893 up until 1933 when federal administration of the Gettysburg National Military Park (and Soldiers’ National Cemetery) was transferred by Executive Order 6166 to the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Actual hard copies of these individual annual reports are extremely rare, as well as the book published in 1905 by the Government Printing Office that contained all of the annual reports from 1893 through 1904. This book has been available online and can be downloaded by going to this link and can also be found by going to the website at http://archive.org/details/annualreportsofg00gettiala:
Unfortunately, there was apparently no similar book printed for the annual reports from 1905 through 1933, although the Gettysburg Discussion Group posted the text (but no photos) from most of those reports (to my knowledge, they still have been unable to find the reports for 1921 through 1926) at their link at http://www.gdg.org/Research/Authored%20Items/BCRReports/rprthm.html.
One final report of interest is the 449-page “Administrative History of the Gettysburg National Military Park” report printed in 1991 by the National Park Service/U.S. Department of the Interior. To view this report, go to https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/gett/adhi.pdf.
As of January of 2018, all of the reports mentioned above were still available online. However, since there is no guarantee that they will be available indefinitely, I recommend downloading any and all of them now that you may be interested in for future reference and enjoyment.
Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar Papers
In the Spring of 1992, the Gettysburg National Military Park held its First Annual “Seminar” focusing on the changing interpretations of the Battle of Gettysburg. There have now been fourteen highly successful Spring seminars to date (the seminar series switched from an annual event to a biennial one after 1998, although there will also be one in 2013 because of the 150th anniversary of the battle) with themes ranging from “Battlefields as Sacred Ground” and “Unsung Heroes of Gettysburg” to “Leadership in the Campaign and Battle of Gettysburg” and “Gettysburg in History and Memory.” With the exception of the first three Spring Seminars (1992-1994), the Seminar papers from the presentations were published in limited quantities and made available to those who attended and usually available for purchase by the public while supplies lasted.
Most of the publications are available online at http://npshistory.com/series/symposia/gettysburg_seminars/index.htm and are well worth reading !!!
Like just about everything, the Gettysburg National Military Park has changed in so many ways ranging from the terrain and topography (both natural and manmade) to the general public’s interest in a specific location or on a facet or hero(es) of the battle. What has also changed is how the Park has been “guarded.” In the early years, park roads were fenced in on both sides and signs were present (such as the one still remaining on the boulder containing the monument to Union General Gouverneur K. Warren on Little Round Top) warning people to stay off the monuments. In addition, from roughly the 1890’s to sometime in the 1920’s, there were five guards (or watchmen) and five guard shacks located in the Park.
As mentioned in various annual reports of the Gettysburg National Military Park Commission, the guards were employed “to prevent desecration and injury of the public works on the battlefield by thoughtless or mischievous visitors, and particularly the mutilation of monuments by the sacrilegious relic hunters that sometimes infest the grounds with the sense of reverence wholly undeveloped.” They were each “required to file a written report every evening covering their observations and work done during the day, indicating what monuments or roads require repair or attention, also the number of articles, in any, which they have found on the field, so that needful orders may be given and everything on the field properly cared for.” They also had “the authority of deputy marshals” and were each paid roughly $40.00 per month.
It is my understanding that the five guard shacks were located on Cemetery Ridge, Seminary Ridge, East Cavalry Field, near Spangler’s Spring, and near Little Round Top. Shown below are photographs of the one on Seminary Ridge, on East Cavalry Field, and the one near Spangler’s Spring:
(L to R: Robert Long, Calvin Lady,Tip Lott, Frank Auman, William Spangler, and William Tawney)
(Photos courtesy of Mike Waricher and the GNMP)
Of the five guard shacks that existed, there is only one foundation that still exists. The foundation (approximately 6 foot by 8 foot in size) is located about 45 yards south of the northern end of the parking lot on Little Round Top on the east side of the road about 20 yards into the woods:
Mike O'Dell, a good friend of mine from my high school days who is also a longtime Civil War re-enactor/collector, showed me in March of 2012 one of his most prized Civil War artifacts, General George Meade’s copy of the Revised 1861 U.S. Army Regulations to June 25, 1863 printed in Washington, D.C. by the Government Printing Office:
Every field officer, from second lieutenant to general, was to know the regulations or at least have an understanding of them and how they were to be applied in camp ranging from quartermaster issues to discipline and everything in between. Many officers had a copy of the regulations stuck in their baggage or field desks beside a copy of the drill manual, but it is unlikely that each and every officer in the Union Army would carry a copy of the field manual, perhaps relying instead of an adjutant or sergeant major having a copy between them for reference.
The U. S. Army Regulations were first revised in 1861 primarily to address the regulations' use for volunteers and to update some of the requirements for tracking equipment, ordnance and rations. There were revised again in 1863 and once more before the end of the war, sometime during the winter months of 1864 - 1865.
Even the smallest change or minor update was considered to be a revision to the entire set (if you wish to read the entire text of the 1863 version, go to http://books.google.com/books?id=_G4DAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false). A condensed version of the regulations was also published during the latter half of the war. August Kautz, a former cavalry officer, expanded on this condensed version and in 1866 published "The 1865 Customs of Service for Non-Commissioned Officers and Soldiers", which was a rank by rank description condensed right from the regulations of the duties each soldier of rank was expected to perform.
The Gettysburg National Military Park has four copies of the U. S. Army Regulations in their collection (including one belonging to Colonel John P. Nicholson, Chairman of the Gettysburg National Park Commission from 1893 - 1922) - two published in 1861 and two in 1862. One copy of the 1861 and both of the 1862 editions were printed by George W. Childs of 628 & 630 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia. He may have been contracted by the Government Printing Office to print additional copies to meet the growing demand, or as a printer, to cash in on the need for newly commissioned officers to outfit themselves. The title pages are missing from the other 1861 edition so the publisher is unknown.
General Meade’s copy measures roughly 5 1/2" by 8 3/4" and contains 594 pages, some of which have notations made by General Meade as evidenced in the last photo above. One can only wonder when General Meade obtained this field manual --- could it have been that fateful morning in June of 1863 when he was given command of the Army of the Potomac only a few short days before the Battle of Gettysburg ??? If that book could only talk ….
(A personal note: my sincere thanks to Mike O’Dell, NPS Ranger/Historian John Heiser, and NPS Museum Specialist Paul Shevchuk for their assistance and detailed information provided for this interesting historical artifact – thank you all very much !!!)
A terrible way to die
The Civil War was a period of military innovation and invention with the development of the observation balloon, the submarine, land mines, sea mines (called “torpedoes”), the Gatling gun, and much more. One invention that is often overlooked is the exploding Minié ball. Referred to as an “explosive shell” by its creator, electrician-inventor Samuel Gardiner from New York, this bullet (which came in both .54 and .58 caliber) contained a cavity within the bullet packed with an explosive compound of phosphorus and mercury fulminate and fused to explode approximately 1½ seconds after being fired.
Gardiner wrote a letter to the War Department in November of 1861 about his invention but never received a reply. Undaunted, Gardiner visited West Point in the Spring of 1862 and demonstrated his invention, prompting a recommendation by an ordnance officer there about procurement for the Union Army. After still no reply from the War Department, Gardiner later resorted to making a personal appeal to President Lincoln, who supported the idea of issuing this new type of ammunition. Even so, General James W. Ripley, head of the Ordnance Department and who thought such a bullet was barbaric, was able to resist all pressure to procure and distribute this explosive bullet until December of 1862 when an order was made for approximately 100,000 rounds. Some of the ammunition was soon requisitioned by General Joseph Hooker of the Army of the Potomac, who conducted his own field tests with disappointing results, as quality control on the mass-produced bullets did not compare with the rounds Gardiner had supplied for testing. Nevertheless, the records of the Ordnance Department indicate that 33,350 of these bullets were actually issued to Union troops in the early part of the war, including some to the 2nd New Hampshire Infantry Regiment, which became the first Union regiment to use them in combat one unforgettable day during the Battle of Gettysburg.
Before receiving a Confederate infantry assault on the afternoon of July 2, the 2nd New Hampshire Infantry Regiment commanded by Colonel Edward L. Bailey endured a lengthy barrage by Southern artillery while supporting Captain Nelson Ames’ Battery G of the 1st New York Light Artillery near the Peach Orchard. During that time, one soldier of the regiment was killed and another badly wounded when artillery fragments struck their cartridge boxes and ignited the new Gardiner “explosive shells.” The following excerpt is taken from “A History of the Second Regiment, New Hampshire Volunteer Infantry, in the War of the Rebellion":
“There were lulls in the artillery firing, but Ames gave the rebels the best he had whenever they demonstrative, batteries could work, both to the left of the peach orchard and along the Emmitsburg road, but the interest of the Second was centered upon Ames. The regiment, from its position, caught a good share of the missiles hurled at the battery, and many men were hit; the wounds being mostly of the horrible character incident to artillery work. Several cartridge boxes were exploded. A shell struck and burst on the box of Corporal Thomas Bignall, of Company C. The cartridges were driven into his body and fired, and for nearly half a minute the devilish "musket shells" issued at Washington were exploding in his quivering form. But death was mercifully quick. The next moment a fragment of shell explored the cartridge box of Sergeant James M. House, of Company I. The rapidity with which he tore off the infernal machine hanging by his side was astonishing, and he escaped with only a severe wound.”
As word of these explosive shells spread, public opinion grew to disallow their use by Union troops and the Ordnance Department eventually responded by shelving the remaining supply, which was destroyed after the war ended. In addition, government records report that roughly 10,000 rounds were simply abandoned on battlefields, some of which were apparently “requisitioned” by Confederate troops and later used in combat as well. According to “The Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion (1861-1865)” prepared in accordance with Acts of Congress under the direction of Surgeon General Joseph K. Barnes, 130 cases of wounded Union soldiers were attributed to explosive bullets were recorded, including soldiers who had fought at Fair Oaks and Malvern Hill in 1862, Chancellorsville in 1863, and the Wilderness, Spotsylvania, Petersburg, Cold Harbor, and Piedmont in 1854. General U. S. Grant is reported to have complained that "their use is barbarous because they produce increased suffering without any increased advantage to using them." This unusual and perhaps macabre topic, however, leaves a few intriguing unanswered questions:
1. The reports of wounded Union soldiers hit by these explosive shells at the Battle of Fair Oaks and the Battle of Malvern Hill occurred months before December of 1862 when the order was made for approximately 100,000 rounds, obviously long before they could have been found abandoned on the battlefields by Confederate troops. Keeping in mind the exploding and bone-shattering impact of the regular Minié ball, could the cause of some of the wounds have been “misinterpreted” by the wounded soldier and/or surgeon? Some of the poor castings of bullets in Confederate arsenals probably contributed to the mistaken diagnosis of explosive bullets. Were the Confederates also experimenting with such an explosive bullet as well?
How many Union soldiers were killed by “requisitioned” Gardiner explosive shells? With the ghastly multiple wounds suffered by so many soldiers, perhaps there was no way to tell, and “dead men tell no tales” as they say.
Corporal Thomas W. Bignall was born on August 3, 1840 in the western New Hampshire town of Acworth. The son of J. P. Bignall and Harriet C. Beckworth, his occupation was listed as a mechanic and he was wounded at the Battle of Second Bull Run in 1862. If you look at the 49 graves in the New Hampshire section of the Soldiers’ National Cemetery in Gettysburg, you will not find Corporal Bignall’s name. Among those 49 graves are 11 marked “Unknown” --- perhaps he is one of those, like so many, many soldiers who were so sadly buried. And that, perhaps, is the most terrible way to die …..
Casualties after the battle
According to the Gettysburg National Military Park, there were roughly 160,000 soldiers (about 85,000 Union troops and about 75,000 Confederate troops) at the Battle of Gettysburg, and there were approximately 51,000 casualties: 23,049 Union (3,155 dead; 14,529 wounded; 5,365 missing/captured) and 28,063 Confederate (3,903 dead; 18,735 injured; and 5,425 missing/captured). But perhaps an argument could be made that there were other “casualties” after the battle and after the Civil War, such as Lieutenant Gulian V. Weir, commander of Battery C, 5th U.S. Artillery at Gettysburg.
Three of Weir’s six guns were overrun on the afternoon of July 2, and Weir, acting without orders, sent his three remaining guns to withdraw to the rear. Even though the three guns that were overrun were eventually recovered, accusations of cowardice by his superior officers (including General Winfield S. Hancock) followed Weir, and the accusations continued long after the war.
Weir apparently never forgave himself for the loss of those three guns on July 2 and never overcame the charges/accusations of cowardice. Weir visited the Gettysburg battlefield in 1885, and wrote that he had returned home a “broken man”. Still serving in the U.S. Army at Fort Patterson, New York, Weir’s fellow officers found that after he returned from Gettysburg, he was “noticeably depressed” as well as “moody” and “discouraged.” Only a few months later, on July 18, 1886, Gulian Weir died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound ……
(Photo courtesy of the GNMP)
Captured battle flags
To say the least, regimental battle flags were extremely prized and honored and fiercely defended. The position of color sergeant as well as the other soldiers (usually corporals) in the regimental color guard were signs of honor, and countless, countless men on both sides died defending their flags during the Civil War. Several of the Union monuments depict the actual likeness of some of those brave soldiers who paid the ultimate price -- men such as Sergeant Benjamin H. Crippen of the 143rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, Sergeant Roland B. Morris of the 13th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, Sergeant Heinrich Michel of the 54th New York Infantry Regiment, and even a colonel, Colonel Harrison H. Jeffords of the 4th Michigan Infantry Regiment at the southern end of the Wheatfield. Located at the "T" intersection of De Trobriand Avenue and Sickles Avenue, this beautifully carved monument shows Colonel Jeffords with the regimental flag he died defending, having been bayoneted after refusing to surrender it (see the “Faces of the battle” section on my “Something Different” page).
An unusual and extreme method of keeping regimental colors from falling in the hands of the enemy was used by the men of the 16th Maine Infantry Regiment. Commanded by Colonel Charles W. Tilden, the regiment was ordered to “make a stand” on Oak Ridge on the afternoon of July 1 in a “rear guard” action in order to allow the rest of their brigade, General Gabriel R. Paul’s First Brigade, Second Division, of the Union I Corps, to retreat toward town and Cemetery Hill. Eventually being overrun and forced to surrender, the soldiers of the 16th Maine Infantry Regiment tore their flag into pieces and hid the shreds among themselves in order to keep it from falling into Confederate hands (see the “Miscellaneous small markers” section on my “Off the Usual Path” page).
It should be noted that captured battle flags were not always treated with respect, which was at least one case after the repulse of Pickett’s Charge on July 3 by Union General Alexander Hays, who commanded the Third Division of General Winfield Hancock’s II Corps and whose troops defended a portion of the Union line on Cemetery Hill in Ziegler’s Grove. After the repulse, General Hays and a few members of his staff dragged several captured Confederate flags behind them as they rode in front of his cheering troops.
On the other hand, there is the interesting story of the capture and final outcome of the regimental flag of the 150th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment at Gettysburg. As part of the Union I Corps, the regiment retreated through the town on the afternoon of July 1 when the entire Union line was forced to withdraw. The entire color guard had been killed or wounded and Corporal Joseph Gutelius of Company D eventually seized the fallen flag as they entered town. The generally accepted account is that Gutelius stopped to rest on a doorstep at the intersection of South Washington and West High Streets and was shot by pursuing Confederates, including Lieutenant F. M. Harney of the 14th North Carolina Infantry Regiment, who seized the regimental flag as a trophy.
Harney himself was soon mortally wounded, and his dying request was that the captured flag be given to Confederate President Jefferson Davis. His wish was granted and North Carolina Governor Zebulon Vance later presented the captured flag to President Davis. When Union cavalry captured Jefferson Davis near Milledgeville, Georgia in May of 1865, the flag of the 150th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment was found carefully packed in his baggage. The flag was taken back to Washington, D.C. and placed in the War Department collection where it remained until it was released to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1869 and placed in that state's collection of Civil War flags. That cherished Union flag (shown below) and many others are still available for viewing by the general public in Harrisburg by contacting the Capitol Preservation Committee. To schedule a tour to see these amazing state treasures, receive additional information about the collection, or obtain a free copy of the Committee's booklet, "Preserving Pennsylvania's Historic Civil War Flags," call (717) 783-6484.
(Photo courtesy of the Capitol Preservation Committee)
The missing Confederate infantry brigades
Following General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson's death after the Battle of Chancellorsville in May of 1863, General Robert E. Lee reorganized the Army of Northern Virginia (now comprised of 39 infantry brigades and 15 artillery battalions plus a division of cavalry) into three corps on May 30, 1863 -- the I Corps still under General James Longstreet, the II Corps under General Richard S. Ewell, and the III Corps under General A. P. Hill. Each corps had three divisions, with two of the divisions in each corps having four brigades and one division in each corps having five brigades.
The three divisions having five brigades were General Richard H. Anderson’s Division in the III Corps, General Robert E. Rodes’ Division in the II Corps, and General George E. Pickett’s Division in the I Corps. When General Pickett was promoted in October of 1862 and given command of a division, that division already had five brigades: General James L. Kemper’s Brigade, General Richard B. Garnett’s Brigade, General Lewis A. Armistead’s Brigade, General Montgomery Corse’s Brigade, and General Micah Jenkins’ Brigade. It should be noted that General Richard H. Anderson’s Division had also previously had five brigades as did General Robert E. Rodes’ Division when he replaced General D. H. Hill.
Along with the rest of Pickett’s Division, Corse’s and Jenkins’ Brigades spent the first few months of 1863 operating in the Virginia “Tidewater” area, but when the Confederate Army began to move northward, both brigades were detached: Corse’s Brigade was to remain on garrison duty in the area around Suffolk and Jenkins’ Brigade was to remain and help guard Petersburg and Richmond. Both Corse and Jenkins were reported to have personally pleaded with President Jefferson Davis to have their brigades be reattached, but their efforts were to no avail. As a result, when General Pickett and his fresh troops were ordered to make that now famous attack on the afternoon of July 3, 1863, the division was far from being at full strength. Accounts vary as to the exact number of soldiers in both of the “missing” brigades, but Corse’s Brigade numbered roughly 1,100 men and Jenkins’ Brigade numbered roughly 2,600 men.
The question remains even to today as to whether these 3,700 troops would have made a difference in the outcome of Pickett’s Charge. Assuming these two brigades would have suffered the same high percentage of casualties, would one-third of the 3,700 been able to make it to the Union lines on Cemetery Ridge? Would over a thousand more “fresh” Confederate troops in addition to those few hundred that actually did break through been able to tilt the balance of the attack in the favor of the Confederates? We will never know.
General Montgomery Corse
General Micah Jenkins
(Images courtesy of the Library of Congress)
A Yankee "Pickett"
While conducting on-site battlefield research in October of 2020 on Barlow’s Knoll, I took a closer look at the monument to the 17th Connecticut Infantry Regiment (see the “The other flagpole” section on this page) and noticed one name in particular of that regiment’s soldiers killed during the battle --- Sergeant Edwin D. Pickett:
According to “The Military and Civil History of Connecticut During The War of 1861-65”, Sergeant Edwin D. Pickett was 28 years old and married with two children. Described by a friend as a taciturn country lad, Pickett was working as a clerk in Ridgefield, Connecticut when he enlisted as a corporal in the 17th Connecticut Infantry Regiment in August of 1862 and promoted to sergeant in November. On July 1, 1863, Sergeant Pickett’s regiment was advancing on Barlow’s Knoll; Pickett was killed while grasping the regimental colors, the third color bearer who had carried them to the death.
News of Pickett’s fate had reached his hometown by July 6 and Edwin’s brother, Rufus Starr Pickett, went to Pennsylvania to retrieve his brother’s body. Rufus searched some time among the dead at Gettysburg before Edwin’s body was found; his blanket was wrapped about him, his watch and pencil given by Starr, were in his coat sleeve. The local Ridgefield newspaper reported that "Sergeant Edwin D. Pickett was a favorite with the men, and much esteemed in Ridgefield, where he lived. On the Sunday of his funeral, the churches suspended other services, and united in the tribute to his high personal character and his manly virtues. To his children he left the legacy of an unspotted name and a record of noble deeds."
According to the National Park Service and their database of Civil War soldiers and sailors (go to https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/soldiers-and-sailors-database.htm), there were roughly more than 400 Union soldiers and roughly more than 400 Confederate soldiers with the last name of “Pickett”. I wonder how many fought each other at Gettysburg ???
Another "Pickett" in "Pickett's Charge"
The discovery of Sergeant Edwin D. Pickett of the 17th Connecticut Infantry Regiment and the more than 800 Civil War soldiers with that famous last name made me wonder if there were any other soldiers named “Pickett” in “Pickett’s Charge”. Going through the database mentioned above, finding soldiers who served in regiments that fought in the Battle of Gettysburg, then confirming if those soldiers in those regiments were indeed on the muster rolls during that time would take countless and countless hours. However, I did check my copy of "Nothing But Glory: Pickett's Division at Gettysburg" by Kathy Georg Harrison and John W. Busey (Thomas Publications) and discovered that there was at least one other Confederate soldier named “Pickett” who participated in “Pickett’s Charge” --- Private Oliver Pickett of Company C of the 24th Virginia Infantry Regiment.
Oliver Pickett enlisted on February 21, 1863 in Company C (the "Carroll Boys") of the 24th Virginia Infantry Regiment in Carroll County, Virginia at 33 years old. During the Battle of Gettysburg, the 24th Virginia Infantry Regiment under the command of Colonel William R. Terry was in General James Kemper’s Brigade of General George Pickett’s Division, and was the furthermost regiment on the right flank during that fateful assault on July 3, 1863. At least part of the regiment was able to get inside of the Union lines; out of 395 men, the 24th Virginia Infantry Regiment suffered over 40% casualties (47 men killed, 83 wounded, and 33 missing or captured). Private Oliver Pickett survived the assault and the rest of the war, and died in 1911.
Were there possibly other soldiers named “Pickett” in Pettigrew’s and Trimble’s Divisions who also participated in “Pickett’s Charge” ???
"Fool me once ...."
One of the interesting and unusual aspects of the Confederate attack on the Union left flank which included two divisions (General John B. Hood’s Division and General Lafayette McLaws’ Division) of General James Longstreet’s I Corps on the afternoon of July 2 was their unplanned countermarch which caused a lengthy delay of about two hours in launching that attack (the attack had already been delayed until General Evander Law’s Brigade of Hood’s Division had arrived from New Guilford in the Cumberland Valley where it had been guarding the rear of the Confederate Army).
General Lee had given orders to both General Longstreet and Colonel E. P. Alexander and his artillery battalion to get into position without being seen by the enemy if at all possible. Colonel Alexander did so and was in position early, and then waited for the two infantry divisions to follow suit. To facilitate matters, General Lee had detached Captain Samuel R. Johnston of his staff to act as a guide for the infantry since Johnston had conducted a lengthy reconnaissance mission in that area on General Lee’s orders during the pre-dawn and early morning hours earlier that day as part of the preparations for the Confederate assault.
After Law’s Brigade finally arrived, the long column of infantry finally started around noon along Herr Ridge and soon reached a small hill not too far south from the Black Horse Tavern. At that point, everyone realized that their movements were now visible by Union Signal Corps troops on Little Round Top, and the column was halted. Discussions lasted for about an hour as everyone waited for a decision to be made as to how to proceed. While waiting and making additional preparations for his artillery battalion to support the upcoming assault, Colonel Alexander ran into the head of the column where many of the officers (including Longstreet, McLaws, and Johnston) were still trying to decide the next step and who would be responsible for making the decision.
Colonel Alexander had led his artillery easily around the same hill by moving out of view to the left into the adjacent fields and hollows for about a quarter of a mile before getting back on to the road they were to be using to get into position and suggested that General Longstreet’s infantry follow the same path (which was easily visible due to the movement of so many cannons, caissons and horses). Instead, General Longstreet finally ordered his men to retrace their route and conduct a countermarch, adding about 2 hours and delaying the attack until approximately 3:30 P.M.
The question remains as to why no one wanted to follow Colonel Alexander’s suggestion, and perhaps at least part of the reason why Captain Johnston did not want to do so is because of a prior incident between the two men on November 22, 1863 during the Battle of Fredericksburg. Colonel Alexander had been directed to assist General Lee’s engineers in locating and constructing gun pits, and persuaded the engineers to construct them on the brows of the hills instead of further back as was originally decided by Captain Johnston, who had been given the assignment. General Lee was not happy with the location of the gun pits and soon criticized Johnston, and even though Alexander soon personally admitted to Lee that it was he who had decided to place the gun pits where they were, Alexander did not move the gun pits further back as now directed by General Lee; as soon as Lee left, Alexander ordered Johnston to keep the gun pits exactly where they were. So the question remains as to whether this prior incident was in the back of Captain Samuel Johnston’s mind that afternoon of July 2, 1863 – was perhaps Johnston thinking of the old saying “Fool me once, shame on you – fool me twice, shame on me” ??
The "Frankenstein" of the Civil War
While Paul Phillipoteaux’s famous “cyclorama” painting is no doubt the most famous (and largest) painting about the Battle of Gettysburg, there is another set of smaller paintings done by a relatively forgotten artist, George Leo Frankenstein, which are worth noting. Born in Germany, Frankenstein came to the United States in 1825 with his family when he was roughly six years old. Settling in Cincinnati, Ohio (it is interesting to note that the family changed its name from “Tracht” to “Frankenstein” when they first arrived in this country), George became an apprentice to his older brother Godfrey as a landscape painter.
When the Civil War began, George joined the Union Army serving in the Commissary Department and later decided to cover the magnitude of the war on canvas, traveling over 3,000 miles to visit major battlefields in Virginia, Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi, and at Gettysburg. Many of his paintings ended up being sold at a New York auction house in 1888, but 24 of the unsold ones were donated after his death (in 1911) by a friend to the National Park Service in 1948. These works of art were distributed in the 1970’s among the appropriate National Parks, with Gettysburg National Military Park receiving three of them (Fredericksburg received seven, Appomattox received five, Chickamauga received five, Shiloh received one, and the NPS Region One Office received three):
East Cemetery Hill - looking north along Baltimore Street
(Courtesy of the GNMP)
East Cemetery Hill - looking roughly northeast
(Courtesy of the GNMP)
East Cemetery Hill – looking southeast toward Culp’s Hill
(Courtesy of the GNMP)
Additional works (approximately 24) can be found in the Special Collections in Musselman Library at Gettysburg College.
General Meade’s offensive plans
While it is true that the Union Army under General George Meade essentially fought a defensive battle at Gettysburg, he did consider and begin to implement offensive plans to mount an attack on July 2 and also to counterattack on July 3 after Pickett’s Charge, but very little has been written about these aspects of the battle until recent years. It should also be noted that although General Meade did begin to implement the Pipe Creek Circular (see the “The Pipe Creek Circular” section at the beginning of this page) early on July 1 by ordering all the supply trains to Westminster, he soon ordered the other Corps to Gettysburg to support the I and XI Corps already fighting there.
After arriving on the battlefield around midnight, it was not long before General Meade included preparations for defensive and offensive operations, including mounting an attack on the Union right flank. An offensive to extend the Union right flank would attack General Ewell’s isolated II Corps that was separated by the town from the other two Confederate Army Corps as well as threaten the Confederate’s main east-west line of operation and communication via the Emmitsburg Road and would also simultaneously better protect Union lines of operation and communication to their own supply base in Westminster (as well as to Baltimore and Washington, D.C.) via the Baltimore Pike and Taneytown Road.
In General Meade’s own words, this attack on the Union right flank by General Henry Slocum and his XII Corps on Culp’s Hill (with the addition of the V Corps and at least a portion of the VI Corps once that Corps arrived on the field) was to be a “strong and decisive attack.” General Meade began a series of orders to General Slocum with a message at 9:30 A.M. asking Slocum to look into the “practicability” of executing an attack on his right. A 10:00 A.M. message from Meade to Slocum stated “make your arrangements for an attack,” and “hold in readiness” that it is to be made “as soon as he [Meade] gets definite information of the approach of the VI Corps, which will be also directed to cooperate in this attack."
However, after Slocum did begin to position his troops for an attack using the concealment of Wolf Hill to do so, he perhaps got “cold feet” later about being isolated from the rest of the Union Army and withdrew his attacking force back to Culp’s Hill and the vicinity of Powers’ Hill on his own volition without orders to do so from General Meade. This put an end to that plan, and while Meade then later considered (although perhaps only briefly) that afternoon conducting an attack from the Union left flank (possibly using the knolls south of Cemetery Ridge as well as Little Round Top and Big Round Top to conceal the movement of Union troops), the Confederate attack launched by General Longstreet’s I Corps obviously required Meade’s thoughts to switch from offense to defense for the remainder of July 2.
At the famous “council of war” in the Lydia Leister farmhouse later that evening, General Meade stated that if the Confederate Army attacked on July 3, it would be at the center of the Union lines. He also told General Winfield Hancock of the Union II Corps that if the enemy attacked, he [Meade] intended to put the Union V and VI Corps on the enemy’s flank. As we all, know, Meade had anticipated correctly, and after Pickett’s Charge, he began to implement plans for a counterattack after first riding with General Alfred Pleasonton to the western slope of Little Round Top (see photos below) and conferring with him, General Gouverneur Warren, VI Corps commander General John Sedgwick, V Corps commander General George Sykes, and General Samuel Crawford of the Third Division of the V Corps in what could perhaps be considered a smaller “council of war."